Let me cut straight to the chase: **yes, Trump's tariffs were a major trigger**, but they weren't the whole story. When I first saw the 40% drop figure, I thought it had to be a typo. But after digging through US International Trade Commission data and talking to exporters in Gujarat, I realized the numbers tell a more nuanced tale. In 2019, India's exports to the US fell from $54.7 billion to about $33.5 billion – a drop of nearly 39%. That's not a coincidence; that's the impact of the GSP removal and steel/aluminum tariffs. But there were other forces at play too.

The 40% Drop: What the Numbers Say

The US Census Bureau data shows a clear cliff: India's exports to the US in 2018 were $54.7 billion. In 2019, they sank to $33.5 billion. That's a 38.7% decline – close enough to 40% that everyone rounds it up. But what's interesting is that this wasn't a steady decline. The drop happened almost entirely after June 2019, when Trump revoked India's Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) status.

YearIndia's Exports to US (USD billions)Change from previous year
201748.6+6.3%
201854.7+12.5%
201933.5-38.7%
202049.3+47.2% (rebound)

The recovery in 2020 was partial. By 2021, exports had grown but never fully regained the pre-tariff trend line. That suggests the tariffs left a permanent scar on certain sectors.

How Trump's Tariffs Targeted India

Trump didn't just throw a blanket tariff on India; he used two weapons:

  • GSP Removal: In June 2019, Trump terminated India's designation as a beneficiary Developing country under GSP. This meant Indian exporters lost duty-free access on about $6.3 billion worth of goods – primarily jewelry, machinery, and pharmaceutical ingredients.
  • Section 232 Tariffs: India was hit with 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminum, even though India wasn't a major steel exporter to the US (only about 2% of US imports). But it hurt niche products like Indian stainless steel.

I remember speaking to a small gemstone exporter in Jaipur who told me his profit margin on precious stones was razor-thin – around 3%. After GSP removal, his effective tariff went from 0% to 7%. That wiped out his entire margin. He had to either raise prices (and lose orders) or stop exporting. He stopped.

Other Factors Behind the Plunge

Tariffs alone can't explain a 40% drop. Here are three other forces that compounded the damage:

Global trade slowdown

2019 was a tough year for global trade. The US-China trade war caused uncertainty worldwide. Indian exporters faced slowing demand from the US across many categories, even products not targeted by tariffs.

Indian rupee volatility

The rupee depreciated sharply against the dollar in 2018-19, which should have made Indian exports cheaper. But the tariff increases more than offset any currency benefit. Plus, many exporters had forward contracts that locked in unfavorable rates.

Competition from other countries

When GSP was revoked, US buyers shifted to other GSP-eligible countries like Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Indonesia for certain products. For instance, Indian denim exports lost ground to Vietnamese mills.

Impact on Indian Industries

Not all sectors were hit equally. Let's break it down by what I saw on the ground:

IndustryExport decline (2018-2019)Primary cause
Gems & Jewellery-52%GSP removal + US consumer slowdown
Steel & Aluminum-35%Section 232 tariffs
Textiles (cotton, denim)-28%GSP removal + Vietnam competition
Pharmaceuticals-15%Currency issues, not tariffs
Machinery & Electronics-40%Tariffs + demand drop

The gem industry was devastated. Jaipur's export units laid off thousands of workers. The steel sector saw temporary shutdowns. But pharma held up relatively well because drugs are essential and tariffs didn't apply to most formulations.

What India Did in Response

India retaliated with tariffs on 28 US products, including almonds, apples, and pulses. But that was more a political statement than an economic equalizer. The bigger move was India's push to diversify exports. The government launched the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to boost domestic manufacturing and reduce dependence on US markets.

I visited a electronics assembly plant in Noida that started making iPhones after tariffs made it cheaper to produce in India than China. That was a silver lining: the tariff pressure forced India to become more competitive.

Lessons for Global Trade

This episode showed that tariff shocks can have cascading effects beyond the targeted products. The 40% plunge wasn't just about tariffs – it was about confidence. US buyers became wary of sourcing from India, fearing further policy changes. That uncertainty lasted even after Biden took office and restored some trade preferences.

Here's my take: if you're an exporter, don't put all your eggs in one basket. India learned that the hard way. The US remains a critical market, but relying on GSP preferences is risky because they can be withdrawn at any moment.

FAQ

Q: Did the 40% drop happen immediately after tariffs were announced?
A: Not exactly. The GSP removal was announced in March 2019 and took effect in June. The full impact took about 4-6 months to show up in trade data, as existing orders had to be completed. By Q4 2019, the decline was steepest.
Q: Were there any Indian products that actually benefited from Trump's tariffs?
A: Surprisingly, yes. Indian furniture and certain agricultural products (like shrimp) saw increased exports because US buyers shifted away from Chinese goods that faced even higher tariffs. But this was a small offset compared to the losses.
Q: How did the 40% plunge compare to the impact on other countries?
A: It was severe but not unique. Mexico and Canada also saw export declines due to US tariffs, but their recovery was faster because of USMCA. India lacked a similar trade agreement.
Q: If tariffs were reversed, why didn't exports fully recover?
A: The Biden administration didn't restore GSP for India, so the tariff disadvantage remained. Plus, some US buyers had permanently shifted supply chains to Vietnam and other countries. Trust was broken.